Wednesday, February 10, 2010

True or false: A person with abnormal brain activity and seizers, should not be on the Supreme Court.?

As long as it does not impair their ability to decide if something is constitutional or not it should not matter what kind of issue they have. That is the only job of the supreme court.True or false: A person with abnormal brain activity and seizers, should not be on the Supreme Court.?
I don't believe you deserve Best Answer, and that should have went Wounded Duck.


Abnormal brain activity, seizures, forgetfulness ,memory loss, brain damage after each seizure is too much for me, and all Americans deserve a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that has a normal brain.

Report Abuse


True or false: A person with abnormal brain activity and seizers, should not be on the Supreme Court.?
I worked with a psychologist who had stress seizures. They were quite horrible to witness, and appeared the same as organic. He looked like a boxer from falling on ground and objects. It would be entirely discriminatory to make this a disqualification for any job not involving motion acuity.


President Bush, yes I use the term though I despise him, has done more for idiocy in high positions, than any world leader in history. I don't mean Nazi, Japanese Militarist before and during WW11, and the like, because of the deaths they caused was different.
false!!!!!!!! every one as long as he/she is a legal citizen of these united states of America has the right to be on the supreme court.
Most seizures can be successfully managed without impairing judgement of those afflicted. This is not a reason for Roberts to step down.
Two seizers in 14 years doesn't exactly constitute a problem.
True, let alone be Chief Justice!
False. Seizures can be well controlled with medicine.
Although I would be happy to see him go...abnormal brain activity and seizures do not significantly handicap a judge.


False.


Give up your prejudices, and learn a little neurophysiology.
man hard question i dont think its a good idea....sorry dont do it...good luck
The man should be a be allowed to fulfill his term until he is no longer able to serve the country.
Based on this very limited information from a non-medical person, I'm assuming here. I realize I could be wrong.





It sounds like no but I would want to know more information.

No comments:

Post a Comment